Abstract
This Cortica journal club has mini-reviewed the engram theory and systems consolidation hypothesis, which are both contributing to an understanding of how memories are made on a neuropsychological level. Yet, to answer the question what individual memories contain, it is essential to take into account the social context. Various studies have shown that social networks are a driving force in determining the content of memories. Certain researchers even argue that individual as well as collective memories are entirely socially constructed. Contemplating this claim is not easy. Even though every human being has their own brain, their own biological and chemical machine, generating and storing memories, it might be that there is very little “my own” in the content we remember. In sum, memory is the bridge between the present and islands of the past. It selectively keeps parts of the past alive, which shape human beings as individuals but also as collectives. This essay reviews and connects neuropsychological and societal mechanisms and influences in the process of learning and memory.
References
- Coman, A., Momennejad, I., Drach, R. D., & Geana, A. (2016) Mnemonic convergence in social networks: the emergent properties of cognition at a collective level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(29), 8171–8176. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525569113
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525569113
- Lebow, R. N. (2006). The politics of memory in postwar Europe. In R. N. Lebow, W. Kansteiner & C. Fogu (Eds.), The politics of memory in postwar Europe (pp. 1-39). Duke University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw204.4
- Marr, D. (1971). Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 262(841), 23–81. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1971.0078
- Momennejad I. (2022). Collective minds: social network topology shapes collective cognition. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 377(1843), 20200315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0315
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0315
- Parkinson C, Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2018). Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nature Communications, 9(332), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7
- Roy, D. S., Park, Y., Kim, M. E., Zhang, Y., Ogawa, S. K., DiNapoli, N., Gu, X., Cho, J. H., Choi, H., Kamentsky, L., Martin, J., Mosto, O., Aida, T., Chung, K., & Tonegawa, S. (2022). Brain-wide mapping reveals that engrams for a single memory are distributed across multiple brain regions. Nature communications, 13(1), 1799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29384-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29384-4
- Semon, R. (1923). Mnemic Philosophy. Allen & Unwin.
- Squire, L. R., & Alvarez, P. (1995). Retrograde amnesia and memory consolidation: A neurobiological perspective. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80023-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80023-9
- Tallman, C. W., Clark, R. E. & Smith, C. N. (2022) Human brain activity and functional connectivity as memories age from one hour to one month. Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(3-4), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2021.2021164
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2021.2021164
- Tonegawa, S., Liu, X., Ramirez, S., & Redondo, R. (2015). Memory engram cells have come of age. Neuron, 87(5), 918–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.002
- Vlasceanu, M., & Coman, A. (2020). Network structure impacts the synchronization of collective beliefs. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7rq4g
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7rq4g
